VOlUME 05 ISSUE 09 SEPTEMBER 2022
1Sakerani, 2Herti Prastitasari, 3Ratna Purwanti,
4Tasya Amelia Ramadhani, 5Rizqieya, 6Noor Faizah Hasanah, 7Syifa Nor Rahmah
1,3,4,5Earlychildhood Education, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
2,6,7Elementary School Education, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i9-44Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This research was motivated by low English vocabulary skills, reading literacy and numeracy based on data and findings in the field. In addition, it is also caused by English being removed from subjects in elementary schools and the absence of facilities to stimulate students to improve reading and numeracy literacy in kindergarten children and early grade elementary school students. Based on these problems, researchers create or develop teaching materials in improving English vocabulary skills, reading literacy and numeracy of kindergarten and elementary school students in the early grades of elementary school. Teaching materials are a product needed in learning to improve teacher efficiency and improve student performance. Teaching materials found in the field are still unable to improve students' English vocabulary skills, reading literacy and numeracy. In addition, the teaching materials used by students are not based on the environment around students, especially wetlands. This research uses a type of research and development (Research and Development) using the Plomp model intended to produce a product. The research stage can be detailed as follows: (1) earlystage research, (2) prototype stage, wetland-based teaching materials, (3) development results are tested based on validity, practicality, and effectiveness. This research produced teaching materials based on Tanah Basah to improve English vocabulary, reading literacy and numeracy skills of low-grade children. The teaching materials developed are in accordance with the development of Plom. The results of the research on this teaching material product were assessed by 4 validators of linguists, mathematicians, English linguists, and design experts and the results showed that the teaching materials criteria were valid to be applied in schools. In the practicality test assessment, obtain practical categories, both kindergarten and low-grade teaching materials. And the effectiveness test assessment obtained an effective category on kindergarten and low-grade teaching materials.
KEYWORDS:Development of Wetland, English Vocabulary, Reading Literacy Skills, Early Childhood Numeracy and Elementary School
REFERENCES
1) Abidin, Mulyati, Yunansah (2018). Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca dan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
2) Aini, N., Zainuddin, Z., & Mahardika, A. I. (2018). Pengembangan Materi Ajar IPA Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Berorientasi Lingkungan Lahan Basah. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v6i2.4919
3) Akbar, S. 2016. Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
4) Alam, S. K., & Lestari, R. H. (2019). Pengembangan kemampuan bahasa reseptif anak usia dini dalam memperkenalkan bahasa inggris melalui flash card. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 274-279.
5) Basyiroh, I. (2018). Program pengembangan kemampuan literasi anak usia dini. Tunas Siliwangi: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Paud Stkip Siliwangi Bandung, 3(2), 120-134.
6) Dewi, P. Y. A. (2019). Gerakan Membaca Di Awal Pelajaran Guna Membangun Budaya Literasi Di Sekolah Dasar. Prosiding Nasional, 77-85.
7) Gipayana, M. (2016). Pengajaran literasi dan penilaian portofolio dalam konteks pembelajaran menulis di SD. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(1).
8) Hoffman, J. L., Teale, W. H., & Paciga, K. A. (2014). Assessing vocabulary learning in early childhood. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(4), 459-481.
9) Ibda, F. 2015. Perkembangan Kognitif: Teori Jean Piaget. Jurnal intelektualita, 3(1), 27 – 38.
10) Ibrahim, I., Aminudin, N., Young, M. A., & Yahya, S. A. I. (2012). Education for wetlands: public perception in Malaysia Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42, 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.177.
11) Iriani, R. (2019). Modul Pembelajaran Problem-Based Lerning Berbasis Lahan Basah Untuk Mempersiapkan Calon Pendidik Berwawasan Lingkungan Lahan Basah. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id//handle/123456789/19561
12) Khairunnisa, S., & Salamah, S. (2018). Pengembangan model pembelajaran berbasis pendidikan lingkungan dengan lahan basah pada madrasah ibtidaiyah di kota banjarmasin. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v10i1.7217
13) Kharizmi, M. (2015). Kesulitan siswa sekolah dasar dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar (JUPENDAS), 2(2).
14) Lubis, E. L. S. (2019). Peran Guru dalam Menciptakan Pembelajaran Literasi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Kelas V SD Negeri 050718 Cempa. Jurnal Sintaksis, 1(1), 7-7.
15) Metiri Group. 2003. Engauge 21st Century Skills: Literacy in the Digital Age. NCREL and Metiri Group : Illinois and California.
16) Mulat, E. S. M. (2017). Proses stimulasi kemampuan literasi awal anak prasekolah oleh guru PAUD di sekolah. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
17) Nurapriani, R., Yanuarsari, R., Ruswandi, A., Muchtar, H., & Hakim, L. (2019). Indonesian Vocabulary Learning for Early Childhood Using Paper Puppet Media. ICSTI 2018, April.
18) Nurdiyanti, E., & Suryanto, E. (2010). Pembelajaran literasi mata pelajaran bahasa indonesia pada siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. Paedagogia, 13(2).
19) Nurlaila. 2011. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Arab Berbasis Komunikatif untuk Mahasiswa Program Studi Keperawatan STIKES Purna Bhakti Husada Batusangkar. Ta’dib 14(2), 145 – 156.
20) OECD, PISA. (2018). Assesment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Raeding, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publisher.
21) OECD. (2018). Programee For International Students Assessment (PISA) Result oPISA 2018.
https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf.
22) Olawale, S.K. 2013. The Use of Instructional Materials for Effective Learning of Islamic Studies. Jihāt al-Islām 6(2), 29 – 40.
23) Olayinka, A. R. B. (2016). Effects of Instructional Materials on Secondary Schools Students’ Academic Achievement in Social Studies in Ekiti State, Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 6(1), 32-39
24) Oluwagbohunmi, M.F., & Abdu-Raheem, B.O. 2014. Sandwich Undergraduates’Problem of Improvisation of Instructional Materials in Social Studies: The case of Ekiti State University. Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary 1(12), 824 – 831.
25) Oxford. (2009). Oxford Learner’s Pocket Dictionary. China: Oxford University Press.
26) PILENDIA, D. (2020). Pemanfaatan Adobe Flash Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika: Studi Literatur. Jurnal Tunas Pendidikan, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.52060/pgsd.v2i2.255
27) Plomp, T. & Nienke, N. 2010. An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Enschede:Netherland Institute for Proceeding Conducted Development.
28) Plomp, T. & Nienke, N. 2013. Educational Research:Part A An Introductional. Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.Prastowo, A. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik: Tinjauan Teoritis dan Praktif. Jakarta: Kencana.
29) Prastitasari, H. 2018. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berdasarkan Pendikatan Kontekstual pada Materi Bangun Datar untuk Peserta didik Kelas IV. [Tesis (Indonesia): Universitas Negeri Malang.
30) Prastitasari, H., Qohar, A., & Sa’dijah, C. 2018. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berdasarkan Pendikatan Kontekstual pada Materi Bangun Datar untuk Peserta didik Kelas IV. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori , Penelitian, dan Pengembangan. 3: 1599-1605.
31) Ridho, M. H., Wati, M., Misbah, M., & Mahtari, S. (2020). Validitas bahan ajar gerak melingkar berbasis authentic learning di lingkungan lahan basah untuk melatih keterampilan pemecahan masalah. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 5(2), 87-98.
32) Rokhmawati, A., & dkk. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Rainbow Book Pada Materi Bangun Datar Kelas IV. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 3(2), 85–94.
33) Sears, S. (2003). Introduction to Contextual Teaching and Learning. Indiana: PhiDelta Kappa Educational Foundation Bloomington
34) Siregar, A. S. B., Tobing, E. G. L., & Fitri, N. R. (2021). Developing of Teaching Materials: Using Animation Media to Learning English Vocabulary for Early Childhood. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(1), 916.
35) Soendjoto, M. A. (2016). Sekilas tentang lahan basah dan lingkungannya. Prosiding Seminar Universitas Lambung Mangkurat 2015, 1-20
36) Sugiyono, (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta
37) Suparno. (2001). Membangun Kompetensi Belajar. Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
38) Syarifuddin A, Suriansyah, A, N. (2022). The Influence of Principal Instructional Leadership, Work Environment and Job Satisfaction on Teacher Performance in State Elementary Schools in Cempaka District, Banjarbaru City. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 05(06), 2257–2266. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i6-34
39) TIMSS. (2015). TIMSS 2015 Report. http://timss2015.org/timss-2015/mathematics/student-achievement/.
40) Tyas, F., & Pangesti, P. (2018). Menumbuhkembangkan Literasi Numerasi Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Soal Hots. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 5. http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.orgissn2407-8530
41) Wahyudi. 2012. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Elektronik Multimedia dengan Macromedia Flash 8.0 untuk Mahasiswa S1 PGSD UKSW. Satya Widya 28(1), 55 – 72.
42) Yuwono, I. 2009. Membumikan Pelajaran Matematika di Sekolah. Makalah disajikan dalam Pelantikan Guru Besar, Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UM, Malang, 5 November.